• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Contact

Golf Hotel Whiskey

Golf Hotel Whiskey: for pilots and aviation enthusiasts

Mounting a camera on the outside of an aircraft

Jim Foley has posted an interesting question on the Ask a Flight Instructor site about the regulations for mounting a camera (a GoPro HDHero2) on the outside of his aircraft. Specifically, Jim wrote:

I have been filming flights for a couple months, and then was told by my CFI that the cheif CFI said not to do it.  When I asked him directly abou it, he said it would disrupt the airflow too much and your lift wouldn’t be sufficient.  (Obviously, that’s not at all true.)  When I told him that was just stupid and that my self and thousands of other people fly with them daily without problem, he then changed and said it was against some FAA reg.   (Which he couldn’t find to prove it.)  He told me if I could prove it was legal, it would be O.K. 

However, Jim has not been able to find anything in FAA regulations either allowing or disallowing it.

imageBill Trussell replied by writing that a modification will typically require a STC to be issued by the FAA but its also possible that a STC already exists for cameras. If so, there can be several ways to get permission off an existing STC. Otherwise, the process can be found here.

On the other hand, Carl Tyler wrote that he read many different things and that no one seems to agree. However, Carl had also heard that so long as you attach the camera to the aircraft without using tools, you are technically not modifying the aircraft structure. Hence:

I attach my go pro to the tie downs on the plane. I attach it with a mount I made that I tighten with wing nuts, no tools.  It’s on and off in seconds.  I’ve used the tie downs below the wing and also on the tail of the plane where it has zero impact on lift. 

Carl also noted that his camera is under the wing and he has not noticed any difference to lift but he also wishes that the FAA would make a firm statement on cameras as you get different interpretations depending upon who you speak to.

Finally, avid aerial photographer and GoPro user Jonathan Silva wrote that lift would not be an issue but the camera coming loose would be as there have apparently been lawsuits over cameras falling and damaging people’s homes plus a swinging camera could damage the aircraft – something insurance would not be to excited to cover. Hence, Jonathan wrote that he understands the Chief CFI’s concern as “there is hell to pay if something goes wrong.”

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Mel says

    April 22, 2012 at 03:57

    I guess Howard Hughes, when he filmed "Wings," did not get the camera memo.

    The FAA and NASA just learned of it, this year? How many planes have been found "Air Worthy" with and without gun cameras? You think the planes that never had a camera have a better safety record then the ones that do?

    Me too…Mel

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Matthew Stibbe
Matthew Stibbe is CEO of Articulate Marketing and Turbine, the easy, online way to deal with office paperwork. He has an FAA CPL/IR and an EASA PPL/IR and sometimes flies a Cirrus SR-22. He also writes about wine at Vincarta and being a better manager at Geek Boss.
Bureaucracy must die eBook
Subscribe via RSS

Recent Posts

  • IATA Airport Abbreviations
  • Upcoming Concorde and Apollo documentaries
  • Lie Back And Think Of England: London To Austin On BA’s New 787 Dreamliner
  • Video: Parachuting from the edge of space
  • Hilarious preflight safety video for GA aircraft
  • San Francisco Airport at night – beautiful time lapse video
  • A practical jetpack (finally) takes off
  • A man in a hot air balloon realises he is lost
  • Pegasus House: The former HQ of the Bristol Aeroplane Company is restored
  • Vintage British aviation posters from the 1920-1930s

Copyright © 2023 Golf Hotel Whiskey. All rights reserved.